Rose v. Ferguson, [2001] B.C.T.C. 1605 (SC)
MLB headnote and full text
Temp. Cite: [2001] B.C.T.C. TBEd. DE.074
Robert John Rose (plaintiff) v. Beverley Anne Ferguson (defendant)
(E004059; 2001 BCSC 1605)
Indexed As: Rose v. Ferguson
British Columbia Supreme Court
Vancouver
D. Smith, J.
November 26, 2001.
Summary:
This headnote contains no summary.
Family Law – Topic 631
Husband and wife – Marital property – Matrimonial home – Right to possession of – See paragraphs 47 to 64.
Family Law – Topic 865
Husband and wife – Marital property – Distribution orders – Matrimonial home – See paragraphs 47 to 64.
Family Law – Topic 875
Husband and wife – Marital property – Distribution orders – Statutes requiring equal division – Exceptions (incl. judicial reapportionment) – See paragraphs 47 to 64.
Family Law – Topic 4022.1
Divorce – Corollary relief – Maintenance and awards – Awards – To spouse – Extent of obligation – See paragraphs 67 to 78.
Family Law – Topic 4045.4
Divorce – Corollary relief – Maintenance – Support guidelines (incl. nondivorce cases) – Special or extraordinary expenses (incl. calculation of amount) – See paragraphs 80 to 84.
Cases Noticed:
Eilers v. Eilers, [1997] B.C.T.C. Uned. C19 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 17].
Boeckler v. Boeckler (1987), 15 B.C.L.R.(2d) 134 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 47].
Izzard v. Izzard (1995), 14 R.F.L.(4th) 367 (B.C.C.A.), refd to. [para. 48].
Moge v. Moge, [1992] 3 S.C.R. 813; 145 N.R. 1; 81 Man.R.(2d) 161; 30 W.A.C. 161; [1993] 1 W.W.R. 481; 99 D.L.R.(4th) 456; 43 R.F.L.(3d) 345, refd to. [para. 60].
Lodge v. Lodge (1993), 31 B.C.A.C. 72; 50 W.A.C. 72; 48 R.F.L.(3d) 365 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 60].
Toth v. Toth (1995), 64 B.C.A.C. 81; 105 W.A.C. 81; 17 R.F.L.(4th) 55 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 60].
Rinta v. Rinta (1980), 16 R.F.L.(2d) 188 (B.C.S.C.), refd to. [para. 64].
Schmidt v. Schmidt (1999), 132 B.C.A.C. 36; 215 W.A.C. 36; 1 R.F.L.(5th) 197 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 75].
Barker v. Barker, [2000] B.C.T.C. 77 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 82].
McLaughlin v. McLaughlin (1998), 113 B.C.A.C. 224; 184 W.A.C. 224; 44 R.F.L.(4th) 148 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 83].
Counsel:
P. Daltrop, for the plaintiff;
P. Daykin, for the defendant.
This action was heard on November 5-9, 2001, before D. Smith, J., of the British Columbia Supreme Court, who delivered the following decision on November 26, 2001.
Please note: The following judgment has not been edited.
