Troubleshooting your Microsoft Word Table of Authorities: A Deeper Dive into Field Codes

by | Jul 29, 2025

This article is part of Jurisage’s 2025 Guide to Creating Tables of Authority in Microsoft Word. Here are links to the other parts of the series: 

In our last article, we talked about the general steps for creating a TOA in Microsoft Word. Now it’s time to dive into some of the more important details that will make your process easier and avoid errors.

Correcting citations by editing field codes

What happens if a citation doesn’t appear correctly in the TOA? For example, perhaps a pincite or errant ¶ made its way into the citation? Or the same citation appears multiple times? These are all problems that can be fixed by directly editing field codes. 

As a reminder, field codes are hidden placeholders that instruct Word to insert or update specific information automatically, like dates, page numbers, cross-references, or citations. Behind the scenes, the Microsoft Word TOA tool uses field codes to mark each citation so that Word can accurately track and compile your cited cases, statutes, or regulations into an organized list.

Revealing field codes, and what they mean

There are two ways to make field codes visible. 

  • To make just the field codes associated with TOAs visible, click the ¶ symbol on the Home tab of the Ribbon in Microsoft Word. You can confirm that the setting is enabled because the ¶ symbol will be shaded, and you’ll start seeing all sorts of other previously-hidden characters, such as little dots between words to indicate spaces. 
  • You can also use the keyboard shortcut Alt+F9, but note that this will reveal all the field codes in your document, which might be a little overwhelming. Hit Alt+F9 to hide them again. 

In any case, if you’ve performed the action correctly you should see the text “{TA }” with some additional cryptic text surrounding your citations. “{TA” stands for “Table of Authorities Entry”.

Let’s look at the components of this field code. A field code has a few parts: the type, indicated by ALL CAPS, and the flags, which are indicated by a slash character. I’ve put them into different colors for the sake of visibility.: 

  • Plain text. This is text that isn’t wrapped in curly brackets. This is always visible to a reader. Note that the plain text actually has nothing to do with what will appear in the TOA itself. That’s governed by what’s in the curly brackets. 
  • TA field code indicator (purple). This is the opening line of the field code. The text “TA” indicates that this is a TOA entry field. 
  • “Long form” flag (\l) (pink). This flag indicates the text that will actually appear in the TOA. Everything within the quotes will show up, exactly as written and formatted.
  • “Short form” flag (\s) (blue). This flag indicates the short form of the citation. This text WILL NOT appear in the TOA, but Microsoft Word will use this text to try to identify subsequent citations.
  • “Category” flag (\c) (green). This flag indicates which category the citation belongs to. The numbering will match the list of categories that appears when you mark a citation. The default is 1, meaning “case”.

Citations not appearing in TOAs

The most likely reason a citation doesn’t appear in your TOA is because you never marked it as a citation. By revealing field codes, you can visually inspect if a citation was marked: if it doesn’t have field codes next to it, Microsoft Word can’t see it!

If this happens, you’ll need to mark the citation using the References > Mark Citation button on the Ribbon. 

Correcting citations

Once you’ve generated a TOA, it might not look the way you’d expect. Consider the example of an errant pincite in a TOA citation:

The most likely reason is that you selected too much text when you were marking the citation, or otherwise didn’t adjust the text at the time. (For a refresher on marking citations, see our previous article). Let’s correct the citation. 

Find the first reference to the citation

First, ensure that field codes are visible. Then navigate to the first time the citation was marked. This might be tricky, so here’s a hint: the first note will contain all three of the TOA entry flags: \l, \s, and \c.

Adjust the text in quotes that comes after the \l flag 

Now you can correct the text. Make the necessary changes in the text between ​​the quotes following the \l flag.

Update the TOA

The final step is to go back to the TOA and update it to reflect your changes. Place your cursor inside the TOA and click “Update Table” on the References section of the Microsoft Word Ribbon.

Fixing missing entries and duplicate entries

You’ve generated a TOA, but one of the pages where the citation occurs is missing from the TOA. Or (more rarely) you’ll see the same entry twice on the TOA. 

These errors are usually due to inconsistencies in how the TOA field code is written across multiple instances of the same citation. 

This can happen when you copy and paste a citation across a document. Here are a few ways:

Copying a “short” citation ahead of a “long” citation

  • You mark a citation in your document as the “long form” version of a citation. 
  • You mark a second instance of that citation, this time as the “short” version. 
  • Then, you move the second instance prior to the first instance. 

If a “short” citation appears before a “long” version, Microsoft Word will simply ignore the short version and only look for the long citation. 

To correct this, copy the long form and paste it over the short form. In fact, you can get away with not using short forms at all!

Inconsistent short forms

Microsoft Word uses the “short form” of a citation as a unique identifier. If you edit the short form in one place but not another, then Microsoft Word won’t pick up the errant one and will not add it to the TOA.

The key here is, if at all possible, don’t edit a short form. It can only lead to trouble!

Conclusion 

Microsoft Word’s built-in TOA functionality provides a useful starting point, but as we’ve explored, it does come with some quirks and limitations. While editing field codes directly can resolve many common errors, it’s important to be cautious, as manual adjustments can sometimes introduce additional challenges. 

This is a good opportunity to remind you about Jurisage’s own automated TOA Builder. Microsoft Word’s built-in TOA tool gives you a strong foundation, but Jurisage’s TOA Builder is fully automated, web-based, simple to use, and available without a subscription! Give it a try and let us know what you think.

Related posts you may be interested in

Creating Tables of Authority in Microsoft Word – The 2025 Jurisage Guide

In this series, we’ll take a deep dive into how to use the most common piece of legal technology available today — Microsoft Word — to generate TOAs. 

Introducing CiteSense and Legislation 2.0

CiteRight introduces groundbreaking enhancements with CiteSense citation recognition and powerful legislative excerpt management.

Five useful resources for Tables of Authorities

Tables of Authorities are complex, finicky things. Luckily, some really smart people have figured out a number of useful tips, tricks, and best practices to wrestle TOAs into order. Here are a few of the ones we like the best.

How I Handle Tables of Authorities (Without Losing My Mind)

Tables of Authorities often show up when you’re busiest. In this post, I share my practical approach to handling TOAs—simple habits, helpful tools, and lessons learned from balancing deadlines with detail.

Creating Tables of Authorities: What the Options Look Like

Since preparing TOAs isn’t exactly pleasant, there are a lot of tools that aim to automate them. We’ve put together this list of TOA tools to help you understand their pros and cons. 

Why Benchmarks are Important — Especially in Law

In a recent blog post, we wrote about Cautious...

Using AI as a collaborative, creative tool

A recent study from Harvard Business School on working alongside LLMs has lessons for lawyers and other professionals who want to leverage AI effectively in our own practices.

Putting legal AI through its paces: An argument for cautious curiosity

Let’s talk about some of the ways that LLMs struggle, and what we can learn about how to integrate AI into our own practices by being mindful of those struggles. 

For Legal Teams Evaluating Generative AI, Curiosity is Your Best Asset

The best way to understand and evaluate specialized legal generative AI is to first explore general-purpose AI—not because it works perfectly, but precisely because it doesn’t. Its shortcomings help you identify exactly what domain-specific AI providers are trying to fix.